ezlee2
Junior Member
Posts: 79
|
Post by ezlee2 on Sept 25, 2018 7:52:17 GMT -5
I'm thinking that it'll be interesting to see what guys say here. For years the franchise QB was king, followed by the BPR stud WR. QBs are still important IMO, but I've seen plenty of average QBs with the right bars win bowls. IMO, the stud WR is where it's at these days and I'm seeing them go for a king's ransom in trades lately.
What say you?
|
|
|
|
Post by WilleB on Sept 26, 2018 21:04:59 GMT -5
I'm in on OL to be honest.
|
|
|
|
Post by dawgfan19 on Sept 26, 2018 21:27:24 GMT -5
I'm still in the QB camp, with WR a close second. However, for WRs, I prefer the RR and GD bars more than BPR.
|
|
|
|
Post by nick on Sept 27, 2018 12:09:52 GMT -5
If you are talking about 1 QB versus 1 WR versus 1 OL I think it is pretty straight forward.
But you want to talk about unit groups, that is something different again. Against multiple players the QB drops.
I would put the WR and OL group pretty close, probably lean towards OL slightly. QB comes 3rd behind those groups.
For me WR only really kicks off when you have 2 really good ones. I think 1 on 1 a superstar RB is close to a WR.
|
|
|
|
Post by bdubbs on Oct 2, 2018 5:36:32 GMT -5
I still think QB is the most important and coveted position in the game. WR's are a pretty strong runner up though. Seems like a talented receiving group can really elevate a QB's level of play, and even great QB's are limited if they don't have talented targets. After that I'd probably say DE for a 43 defense, I'm starting to think a really strong pass rush will give you more incompletions than a good secondary. Plus more sacks, sack fumbles. That said if a great CB or S falls to me I'm not going to snub my nose at the chance.
I think OL and DL is more important than RB's or LBs. I've seen plenty of nothing special hb's pick up 5ypc behind a talented OL, and I already mentioned I believe in the power of the pass rush.
|
|
|
|
Post by garion333 on Oct 9, 2018 13:10:44 GMT -5
TE  |
|
|
|
Post by rush27 on Oct 9, 2018 15:47:53 GMT -5
TE It's great that a TE can be a difference maker now |
|
|
|
Post by bdubbs on Oct 11, 2018 20:44:56 GMT -5
I don't know if I'd take a TE in the top 10 though... definitely top 15
|
|
|
|
Post by garion333 on Oct 12, 2018 8:21:54 GMT -5
Oh, I absolutely would. If there's a sure fire stud I see no reason to avoid them in the top 10.
I said TE because it wasn't in the list, so I was kidding, but I totally think a stud TE can be a great weapon. They generally can't be your only weapon though.
|
|
|
|
Post by nick on Oct 12, 2018 10:27:56 GMT -5
I drafted a TE at 1.7 in the RZB. He is the all-time league leader in TDs. 85/85 in his prime. He was well worth 1.7.
|
|
|
|
Post by manwithnoname on Oct 13, 2018 14:44:32 GMT -5
I drafted a TE at 1.7 in the RZB. He is the all-time league leader in TDs. 85/85 in his prime. He was well worth 1.7. I keep forgetting he's in the league but he's still putting up decent numbers in Oakland. Feels like he retired a few years ago though. |
|
|
|
Post by nick on Oct 14, 2018 5:19:05 GMT -5
I drafted a TE at 1.7 in the RZB. He is the all-time league leader in TDs. 85/85 in his prime. He was well worth 1.7. I keep forgetting he's in the league but he's still putting up decent numbers in Oakland. Feels like he retired a few years ago though. Name me 3 players that play for the Raiders without looking. |
|
|
|
Post by manwithnoname on Oct 14, 2018 10:55:22 GMT -5
I keep forgetting he's in the league but he's still putting up decent numbers in Oakland. Feels like he retired a few years ago though. Name me 3 players that play for the Raiders without looking. Greg Huntley and Bo Moss and Scary Terry Reeves. I was just looking for Terry the other day to see how he’s been turning out or I wouldn’t have been able to give you three names. |
|
